How Quantum Schwa of A’-0-A’ Helps in Quantum Bit 167

How Quantum Schwa of A’-0-A’ Helps in Quantum Bit, Flip, Phase Error Detection, Correction with IBM Researches: Quantum Computing, Education and Research: Quantum Theory of DNA, TGD and TQC : Gurmukhi and Be Happy Philselfologically 167

How Quantum Schwa of A’-0-A’ Helps in Quantum Bit, Flip, Phase Error Detection, Correction with IBM Researches: Quantum Computing, Education and Research: Quantum Theory of DNA, TGD and TQC : Gurmukhi and Be Happy Philselfologically 167

In this part of the series, the 167th, we discuss the Role of A’-A’, the Quantum Schwa of A as the Dimensions, BIT and the Qubit Systems in the Math, Computing and the Programming, and it also helps in fixing the BIT and Flip Errors with simple learning of how codes in Bit-Flip errors work using the Philosophy of Quantum Schwa as the Single Model and Theory of Everything. In our this blog post, the part of the series, we use it for the Quantum Computing and Programming.

“Error correcting codes are essential to computing and all sorts of communications. At first they seem a bit like magic. How can you possibly not only detect an error but correct it as well? How do they work? In fact it turns out to be very easy to understand their deeper principles.

A fundamental application of coding theory is the detection and correction of errors. Without modern error correcting codes the audio CD would never have worked. It would have so many clicks, pops and missing bits due to the inevitable errors in reading the disc that you just wouldn’t listen to it.” (With thanks from the source: http://www.i-programmer.info/babbages-bag/214-erro… )

Philosophy of Schwa Dimensions as the A, E, O, AE: We have resolved the Problem of 4 Dimensions using the 0, A’, A, 2A in which we have the 0-Dimension, the A’ as the First Dimension of the universe as it’s in the Linguistics in which we have the Schwa as the A’-A’, and the A’-A’=A is the 2nd (Second) Dimension of the Universe, which represents the Schwa by itself as the Linguistic Dimension in the world languages, and according to the Indian Sacred Systems, the Vowels, Consonants, and the Letters may not exist without the A’-A’, the A as the Schwa Dimension of Everything. The 3rd Dimension goes as the A’-A’-A’, but it immediately goes into its 4th Dimension of A’-A’-A’-A’ as A-A or the 2A Dimension. In other words, the 3rd Dimension of A’-A’-A’ either goes to A’-A’ (A) or A’-A’-A’-A’ (2A) if we notice the Indian Languages, Linguistics and the Grammars, its what we can say and call as the Quantum Bit-Flip Errors, the 3A’ going to 2A’ (BIT, the A’-A’ or simply A) and or 4A’ (2A, the Flip):

“In quantum computing, bit-flip errors are still a problem, but so is something called a ‘phase-flip’ error. That’s when the error flips the phase relationship between ‘0’ and ‘1’ in the superposition state — a ‘0+1’ turns into a ‘0-1’ or vice versa.

“Say you have a wave — maybe sine wave or cosine wave,” Chow says. “If you have these two waves and you jostle them together, the sound might add together and constructively interfere. They’d be in phase. If you jostle them opposite each other, the sound might cancel due to destructive interference. In this way, they’re out of phase.”

To correct errors in quantum computing, you need to be able to detect bit-flip errors and phase-flip errors simultaneously. But until now, it has only been possible to address one type of quantum error at a time. That’s especially problematic because quantum information is very fragile — all existing qubit technologies lose their information when interacting with matter and electromagnetic radiation.

To break down that hurdle, the IBM researchers developed a quantum bit circuit, based on a square lattice of four superconducting qubits on a chip roughly 6mm on a side, rather than the linear array of qubits that researchers have used in the past.” (With thanks from the source: “IBM researchers make quantum computing breakthroughs“)

Here, the point of concern is that in the Schwa of A as say the A’-A’, we have it as the A’ is synonymous to BIT in the Classical Computing, and thus the A’-A’=2 BIT, and if we create any variations in the A’-A’, it all goes to its Quantum Base and thus at the A’-0-A’, which is equal to A’-A-A’, and we can consider it the Quantum Qubit where the BIT Error is present in how 2A’ create the BIT Result of A, the Quantum Schwa from the A’-0-A’, and as a result, we have A’-A-A’ in which A, the Schwa as the 2 BIT System comes from the Two A’s, the 2 BITS, and it follows Pauli Exclusion Principle, and at the 3 BITS, we have the A’-A’-A’, and that 4 BITS give us the A’-A’-A’-A’, which result in the A-A (where A=A’+A’=2A’), and speaking exponentially, we notice that E=A’-A’-A’=3A’ Systems, where we use the E=O+A=A’+A’-A’=SinA+CosineA Systems of Euler to solve the Problems in the Quantum Qubit Systems. The Schwa of 4A’s give us the A+E=A’+(A’+A’+A’), and its the Quantum Leap of Quantum Schwa (A=A’-A’) as we study in the Languages, Linguistics and the Phonetic Systems.

“Substantial progress has recently been reported in the determination of the Hilbert-Schmidt (HS) separability probabilities for two-qubit and qubit-qutrit (real, complex and quaternionic) systems.

An important theoretical concept employed has been that of a separability function. It appears that if one could analogously obtain separability functions parameterized by the eigenvalues of the density matrices in question{rather than the diagonal entries, as originally used{comparable progress could be achieved in obtaining separability probabilities based on the broad, interesting class of monotone metrics (the Bures, being its most prominent <minimal> member.

In this regard, we employ an Euler-angle parameterization of SO(4) derived by S. Cacciatori (reported in an Appendix){in the manner of the SU(4)-density matrix parameterization of Tilma, Byrd and Sudarshan. We are, thus, able to nd simple exact separability (inverse-sine-like) functions for two real two-qubit (rebit) systems, both having three free eigenvalues and one free Euler angle. We also employ the important Verstraete-Audenaert-de Moor bound to obtain exact HS probabilities that a generic two-qubit state is absolutely separable (that is, can not be entangled by unitary transformations)… (Please read more from the source with our thanks: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.0267.pdf )

The A’ is also one of the Spin, which has its anti-pair, and thus when we A’-A’ join it creates the Pair of Spin and Anti-spin, which makes the 4A’s to have the 8 Spins, and thus the 4A’s giving us the 4 and 8 Dimensional Quantum, the Life Systems. In the Indian Sacred Systems, the A, the Schwa is the “Consciousness, the Chetana, the Jeeva, the Vishnu Part of Life, which sustains life in the Universe”, and thus when we study the Braided Groups and Knots using the 4A’s, it’s also the Study and Research of Consciousness, which is also popular as the Quantum Topological Geometrodynamics, the Quantum TGD as well promoted by Matti Pitkänen with his great works of TGD inspired theory of consciousness and biosystems as macroscopic quantum systems, in which he has used the X’s instead of our A’s as described in the reference below:

“Spacetimes as a 4-D surfaces in 8-D imbedding spaces

Topological Geometro-Dynamics (TGD) can be regarded as a unified theory of fundamental interactions. TGD was originally an attempt to construct a Poincare invariant theory of gravitation. Spacetime, rather than being an abstract manifold endowed with a pseudo-Riemannian structure, is regarded as a 4-surface in the 8-dimensional space H=M^4_+\times CP_2, where M^4_+ denotes the interior of the future light cone of the Minkowski space (to be referred as light cone in the sequel) and CP_2= SU(3)/U(2) is the complex projective space of two complex dimensions ( see the appendix of <TGD> and Fig. 1 ). The size of CP_2 which is about 10^4 Planck lengths replaces Planck length as a fundamental length scale in TGD Universe.

The basic manifesto behind quantum TGD is the geometrization of not only classical physics but also of quantum theory. Only the notion of quantum jump remains outside the geometrization program.

a) The arena of quantum dynamics is the infinite-dimensional space CH of all possible 3-surfaces of H=M^4_+\times CP_2. Since one can assign to a given 3-surface X^2 a unique spacetime surface X^4(X^3), one could equivalently speak of the space of four-surfaces satisfying the field equations defined by the fundamental variational principle. This space is geometrized by providing it with a metric and spinor structure crucial providing geometrization of distance measurement and spin. The infinite-dimensionality of the space CH has dramatic implications: the mere requirement that the metric exists and allows Riemann geometry fixes the metric essentially uniquely. Also the choice of the imbedding space H is fixed to H=M^4_+\times CP_2 since maximal symmetries are required in order that the configuration space geometry exists mathematically.

The new tripartistic view about existence differs from monistic and dualitic theories. There is ‘holy trinity’ of existences and dynamics.

a) The dynamics defined by the absolute minimization of the so called Kähler action corresponds to the dynamics of material existence, with matter defined as “res extensa”, three-surfaces in 8-dimensional space H=M^4_+\times CP_2.” (With thanks from the source: http://www.emergentmind.org/pitkanen_i.htm )

He has also described how the 4A’ and the 8A’, the Spins of Consciouness play an important role in the “Topolofical Quantum Computation” and TGD: Please read more from the link: http://www.tgdtheory.fi/public_html/pdfpool/tqc.pd…

So, we can notice the Role of 4A’s, which we have also discussed as the A’, 2A’, 3A’, 4A’ or the A, E, O, AE Dipole as the Hypothesis of Quantum Computers:

“Quantum Computing in DNA by Stuart Hameroff

Hypothesis:

DNA utilizes quantum information and quantum computation for various functions. Superpositions of dipole states of base pairs consisting of purine (A,G) and pyrimidine (C,T) ring structures play the role of qubits, and quantum communication (coherence, entanglement, non-locality) occur in the “pi stack” region of the DNA molecule.

Entanglement among the qubits, necessary in quantum computation is accounted for through quantum coherence in the pi stack where the quantum information is shared Consider a string of three base pairs: A-T G-C G-C A-T can be either A T or A T, or quantum superposition of both | A T > + | A T > G-C can be either G C or G C, or quantum superposition of both | G C > + | G C> As each pair may be in two possible dipole states mediated by quantum mechanical interactions, the 3 base pairs may be seen as a quantum superposition of 8 possible dipole states: A T A T A T A T G C G C G C G C G C G C G C G C A T A T A T A T G C G C G C G C G C G C G C G C. (Please read more from the sources with our thanks: http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/content/quantu… and https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/1690?locale-a… )

In this series of Be Happy Philselfologically, we are not only dealing with BIT, Qubit and thus the Information Technology, but also how it’s going to influence the Sounds and Shapes in the Universe.

So, we also deal with the Sound Energy and the Quantum Systems in the Universe as we will have many wonders from the Magic Spell from Achim Kepmf’s Theory of Sounds, Shapes and Universe. The Dimensions of A’-A’-A’ and 4A’ that is the 3rd and the 4th Dimension of A, the Schwa is represented by the E=3A’ and EA=4A’, and can easily put it all as the Geometric Topology, Sounds and Shapes as Achim Kepmf says:

“In geometric topology, the theory of manifolds is characterized by the way dimensions 1 and 2 are relatively elementary, the high-dimensional cases n > 4 are simplified by having extra space in which to “work”; and the cases n = 3 and 4 are in some senses the most difficult. This state of affairs was highly marked in the various cases of the Poincaré conjecture, where four different proof methods are applied.” (With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension )

One of the aspects of A’-0-A’ as the BIT and Qubit Systems is not the only good and great thing it can give as the Single Model and Theory of Quantum Schwa for Everything, which also includes the Unification Theories and the Models, but that if we put “i”, the Imaginary and Complex Number Systems and thus Spacetime Systems, we can get almost any results by “i-0-i”. It invites our attention to the point that the very BIT System exists inside it say as A’-0-A’ and A’-1-A’ if we use Pauli Exclusion Principle where A’-A’ either add up to give 1, the A, the Quantum Schwa or give 0, when both A’ Systems are in the same direction. So, the A’-A’ naturally gives the (1,0) for both the BIT and the Qubit say with A’-0-A’. We can use it for the Pairty Bit:

“A parity bit, or check bit is a bit added to the end of a string of binary code that indicates whether the number of bits in the string with the value one is even or odd. Parity bits are used as the simplest form of error detecting code.

There are two variants of parity bits: even parity bit and odd parity bit.

In the case of even parity, the number of bits whose value is 1 in a given set are counted. If that total is odd, the parity bit value is set to 1, making the total count of 1’s in the set an even number. If the count of ones in a given set of bits is already even, the parity bit’s value remains 0.

It can be calculated via an XOR sum of the bits, yielding 0 for even parity and 1 for odd parity. This property of being dependent upon all the bits and changing value if any one bit changes allows for its use in error detection schemes.

Parity bit checking is used occasionally for transmitting ASCII characters, which have 7 bits, leaving the 8th bit as a parity bit.” (With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_bit )

In the Indian Alphabets say the Sanskrit, Hindi and Gurmukhi, we usually have the 25 Consonants as the Dimensions of 5 Basic Elements of Space, Air, Water, Fire and Solid as the “Mediums” through which the Sound of A, the Schwa travels and the A’ of Sound Joins the A’ of the Medium, and creates the 25 Sets of A’-A’ or 2A’ or simply A, the Schwa, which can be say K’-A=K, where the K is Sound of Space Element that we get from the K’+A=K’+Schwa=K. In the Gurmukhi Alphabets we have the 25 Consonants as the 25 Strings, and when we deal with the Vacuum, it seem to exactly exist say as the 0 in Union with the “A'”, which is Free Existence of Schwa in every letter that we express as the Aspirated Sound or Letter and thus say as K’, L, M’, etc., and it simply means the Schwa is the Sacred Symbol of Coexistence as A’-A’, which is also Supersymmetry, we can also have the Asymmetry say as K-A’=K’ or A’-K=K’ as say the Left or Right Schwa as K’, and how easy it can be if we say it’s the K’, the K-Schwa to say.

In the Indian Languages, every letter has its independent state in the universe, and thus it’s written say as the K’, L’, M’, etc. and here it simply means that these letters coexist with the Schwa, the A, and thus say the K=K’-Schwa=K’-A=K, and thus the Indian Alphabets are taught and educated as the K’+A, L’+A, M’+A, etc., which gives every letter for speaking and writing as the K-Schwa, L-Schwa, M-Schwa, etc.

If we create Indian Linguistic Math or Homotopy Type Theory, the Invariant Math Systems, we can very easily notice that O is A’, A is A, and E is A-A’, and it gives Schwa-A’=A’, Schwa+A’=E, and that Schwa+Schwa=2A=EA (It various how we treat the sounds say as Vibration of A’, 2A’, 3A’, 4A’ or the O, A, E, AE Waves). No wonder, we can have the Schwa Mathematics! 

Well, the Series of Be Happy Philselfologically when discusses the A’, 2A’, 3A’, 4A’, 0, A, 2A, etc., it’s all Schwa Quantum Mathematics! 

Now, one may ask how and why we should read, learn, study and research about it all, the 0, A’, A (=2A’), 2A (=4A’), and the 0, A’, 2A’, 3A’ and the 4A’ with the A, E, O, AE is that its all the “Base, Basics and Backbone of the Quantum Qubit Computing” in which we have the 0-A as the Set of Qubit as its Superposition:

“A superposition state of a qubit, or having the values 0 and 1 at the same time, is denoted as “0+1″. A phase error flips the sign of the phase relationship between 0 and 1.” (With thanks from the source: “The Golden Age Of Quantum Computing Is Upon Us (Once We Solve These Tiny Problems)-Literally tiny. As IBM announces a big advance, many challenges remain in building a computer that takes advantage of quantum weirdness“)

When we discuss about the Quantum Schwa as of 0 and A, we always have it as the 0-A of the Quantum Qubit Computing that uses it say as 0-1, and creates the Superposition of 0-1 as 0-A, and goes to describe our most modern systems of Quantum Qubit Computing” that uses the A’, 2A’, 3A’ and 4A’ to create all that we write in the Information Universe and thus the Quantum Schwa as the “Sacred Creator of the Information Universe”:

“What Is “Quantum” Anyway:

A classical binary bit is always in one of two states—0 or 1—while a quantum bit or qubit exists in both of its possible states at once, a condition known as a superposition. An operation on a qubit thus exploits its quantum weirdness by allowing many computations to be performed in parallel. A two-qubit system would perform the operation on 4 values, a three-qubit system on 8 and so forth.

Only one type of error can occur in the information stored by a classical computer, a bit-flip, where a 0 is mistakenly flipped to 1 or vice versa. Qubits suffer from bit-flits but also from phase errors. A superposition state of a qubit, or having the values 0 and 1 at the same time, is denoted as “0+1″. A phase error flips the sign of the phase relationship between 0 and 1.” (With thanks from the source: “The Golden Age Of Quantum Computing Is Upon Us (Once We Solve These Tiny Problems)-Literally tiny. As IBM announces a big advance, many challenges remain in building a computer that takes advantage of quantum weirdness“)

When we discus about the A-A, its same as the Two Qubit Systems in the Quantum Qubit Computing Systems, and it fully embraces the Two Bits from the 0-A of the 0, A’, A from two systems which on union of A and A creates the A-A, the 2A Systems in the Indian and the World Languages, Linguistics and the Grammars, which can very easily map the problems of the Quantum Qubit Computing, which we want to develop at the Life Dynamix Research and Development (R&D;) for the said purposes:

“IBM’s new error-detection scheme is based on a technique called surface code which spreads quantum information across many qubits. Two syndrome (or measurement) qubits are coupled with two code, or data qubits. One syndrome qubit reveals whether a bit-flip error has occurred to either of the code qubits, while the other syndrome qubit flags the case where a phase-flip error occurred, all without directly measuring either of the qubits.

But error correction is just one of the obstacles on the rocky road to building a practical quantum computer.” (With thanks from the source: “The Golden Age Of Quantum Computing Is Upon Us (Once We Solve These Tiny Problems)-Literally tiny. As IBM announces a big advance, many challenges remain in building a computer that takes advantage of quantum weirdness“)

So, when we discuss about the Quantum Qubit, it needs to be what the Modern Quantum Scientists call Holy Grail of Logical Qubit, the Quantum Schwa of A, E, O, AE from the A’, 2A’, 3A’, 4A’ giving us the A’, A, 2A’, 4A’, 2A, etc., and that is what the Life Dynamix R&D; wants to solve and help humanity through this series and or otherwise:

“IBM’s Chow remains sanguine about the obstacles ahead, and particularly about the challenge of creating the holy grail of a “logical qubit,” which is built using physical qubits but which does not lose its information and is error corrected. “A lot of these problems will be solved in the next few years and that will help us get to where we can demonstrate logical qubit encoding. Then we can take a step toward some true quantum algorithms on top of that logical layer.”

And the way that we all use computers—scientists, cryptographers, data crunchers, Internet searchers—will be just a little bit closer to a quantum leap.” (With thanks from the source: “The Golden Age Of Quantum Computing Is Upon Us (Once We Solve These Tiny Problems)-Literally tiny. As IBM announces a big advance, many challenges remain in building a computer that takes advantage of quantum weirdness“)

When we thus develop the A, 2A and 4A from the base of 0, A’, 2A’, 3A’, 4A’ and the Transitions of 2A’ to A and 4A’ to 2A, we can notice how in the world languages and linguistics, we use the 2A-2A as the 4 Quantum Qubit Systems of Computing, which is the Highest Level of Schwa as say the 2A-2A in the Sanskrit, and the Sanskrit Based Languages say the Hindi and Gurmukhi (Punjabi), which IBM seem to have well used in their researches on the Quantum Computers:

“If scientists can first detect and then correct these errors, it’s a major step in the right direction to building a working quantum computing system capable of doing enormous calculations.

“Quantum computing is a hard concept for most to understand, but it holds great promise,” said Dan Olds, an analyst with The Gabriel Consulting Group. “If we can tame it, it can compute certain problems orders of magnitude more quickly than existing computers. The more organizations that are working on unlocking the potential of quantum computing, the better. It means that we’ll see something real that much sooner.”

A year ago, D-Wave Systems Inc. announced that it had built a quantum system, and that NASA, Google and Lockheed Martin had been testing them.” (With thanks from the source: “IBM advances bring quantum computing closer to reality“)

Now, when we consider say a BIT, its say as the A’-0-A’, where the 0 acts as A’-A-A’, and that A’-A’=A, the Schwa as the 1 BIT in the Classical Computing, but the A’-0-A’ goes as the Quantum Qubit, and in it, the A’-A’ follows the Pauli’s Exclusion Principle, and can carry the BIT Error, and when we use the A’-A’-A’ or even the A’-0-A’, it may create the BIT Sign troubles as we have the Pauli Exclusion Principle at A’-A’, which when combines with the A’, we have the (A’-A’)-A’ or (A’-0-A’)-0-A’, which may not follow the Pauli’s Exclusion Principle, and it collapses into either Lower Octave say A’-A’ or to the Higher Octave of A’-A’-A’-A’ or A’-0-A’-0-A’-0-A’, which Flips as A-A as A’-A’=A, and it too follows the Pauli’s Exclusion Principle, and thus we have the A’, 2A’, 3A’ and 4A’ giving us the BIT Errors with Sign and Flip Errors say at A’-A’ (2A’), 3A’, and 4A’, and that is what we describe as the Quantum Errors of Quantization, and thus needs “Quantum Codes” as the “Classical Error Correcting Codes”:

“Quantum error correction is essential if one is to achieve fault-tolerant quantum computation that can deal not only with noise on stored quantum information, but also with faulty quantum gates, faulty quantum preparation, and faulty measurements.

Classical error correction employs redundancy. The simplest way is to store the information multiple times, and—if these copies are later found to disagree—just take a majority vote; e.g. Suppose we copy a bit three times. Suppose further that a noisy error corrupts the three-bit state so that one bit is equal to zero but the other two are equal to one. If we assume that noisy errors are independent and occur with some probability p. It is most likely that the error is a single-bit error and the transmitted message is three ones. It is possible that a double-bit error occurs and the transmitted message is equal to three zeros, but this outcome is less likely than the above outcome.” (With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_error_correc… )

In our series, we have also discussed the 0-A’ as Philosophy, Self as “A”, the Schwa and the 2A as the Science, and thus Philselfology becomes simply the 0-A’-A-2A, and we can put it say as A’-A-2A, the Philselfology, and 0-A’-A-2A as the Quantum Philselfology, and thus the Quantum Schwa Sacred Systems as the Single Model and Theory of Everything.

The IBM International Research and Developments have received a great success with the 4 Qubit Systems, which we have described with the 0, A, 2A with its transitions and the flips at the 2A’ and 4A’ that convert the 2A’ into the A and 4A’ into the 2A, and the 4 Qubit uses the Pair of 2A-2A, the 4A’-4A’ Systems of the Quantum Schwa, which creates the Information Universe and all that we have in the Computers as the Information Universe of Databases:

“The IBM Research team addressed one aspect of this problem in their experiments. They demonstrated error detection operations using a four-qubit square lattice of superconducting qubits, which is roughly one-quarter-inch square. They were the first to detect and measure the two types of quantum computing errors (bit-flip and phase-flip). Previously, it was only possible to address one type of quantum error or the other. The next step in the field is to correct quantum errors, an important step toward building a large quantum computer.

The square lattice design of our circuit is important for scaling to larger systems of qubits. By being the first to use this configuration, which I believe the rest of the research community will need to adopt, the IBM team will be able to add more qubits to get to a working system. We are already conducting tests of eight qubits in a square lattice in our lab.” (With thanks from the source: “We’re Entering a Golden Era of Quantum Computing Research“)

Now, as our Hypothesis of Philselfology deals with the Languages, Linguistics, Grammars, Math, Music and thus the Sacred Systems, it goes to embrace the Logical Positivism and what we can the Modern and the Western Systems of Science, Math, Philosophy and Research:

“Logical positivism and logical empiricism, which together formed neopositivism, was a movement in Western philosophy that embraced verificationism, an approach that sought to legitimize philosophical discourse on a basis shared with the best examples of empirical sciences.

Interpreting Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language, logical positivists identified a verifiability principle or criterion of cognitive meaningfulness. From Bertrand Russell’s logicism they sought reduction of mathematics to logic as well as Russell’s logical atomism, Ernst Mach’s phenomenalism—whereby the mind knows only actual or potential sensory experience, which is the content of all sciences, whether physics or psychology—and Percy Bridgman’s musings that others proclaimed as operationalism. Thereby, only the verifiable was scientific and cognitively meaningful, whereas the unverifiable was unscientific, cognitively meaningless “pseudostatements”—metaphysic, emotive, or such—not candidate to further review by philosophers, newly tasked to organize knowledge, not develop new knowledge.” (With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_positivism )

We desperately need Quantum Qubit Computing Education in India and Asia as we notice the Institute for Quantum Computing, the IQC in Canada achieving great marvels with its great missions for future:

“The IQC seeks to harness quantum mechanics to develop transformational technologies that will benefit society and become a new engine of economic development in the 21st century. It aims to develop and advance quantum information science and technology at the highest international level through the collaboration of computer scientists, engineers, mathematicians and physical scientists.<2>

The institute’s three strategic objectives have been stated as:

To establish Waterloo as a world-class centre for research in quantum technologies and their applications.

To become a magnet for highly qualified personnel in the field of quantum information.

To establish IQC as the authoritative source of insight, analysis and commentary on quantum information.

(With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Quantu… )

Few more words can enlighten one to think of opening coaching or study center even the branch office of the IQC:

“Why Quantum?

Computers keep getting smaller and more powerful. The microprocessors we have today are unbelievably faster and more useful than the monolithic computing machines of a half-century ago. By fitting more and more transistors onto every microchip, engineers have continually halved the size and doubled the power of computers.

This research has created a wealth of new knowledge, and is already spawning the first wave of practical quantum technologies. While the full-scale quantum computer remains a longer-term objective, technologies such as quantum cryptography systems and quantum sensors are already reaching the marketplace.

The Future

IQC’s recent expansion into the Mike & Ophelia Lazaridis Quantum-Nano Centre (Lazaridis Centre) at the University of Waterloo will fuel IQC into the next stage of its rapid evolution of tremendous growth and breakthrough science. The state-of-the-art facility is named in recognition of the vision and extraordinary support of Lazaridis, whose contributions since inception have exceeded $100 million.

In the coming years, IQC will reach its projected complement of 30 faculty members, 50 postdoctoral fellows and 125 students. With IQC as a world-leader in quantum information research, Waterloo and Canada are becoming known as “Quantum Valley” — the epicentre of the next information revolution.” (with thanks from the source: https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-for-quantum-computi… )

If we consider the Quantum Computing by Microsoft Research, it’s for the Quantum Computing and Creating a new generation of computing devices:

“Quantum computing is a field of research that applies the principles of quantum physics and new directions in materials science to building a new type of computers that use quantum effects in computation. Beyond creating quantum computers, the field also includes studies of algorithms that such computers can execute.

We are exploring theoretical and experimental approaches to creating quantum computers. We employ researchers, theorists, and experimentalists from mathematics, physics, and computer science, in partnership with academic and research institutions around the globe. Our mission is to advance our understanding of both quantum computing and its applications and implementation: Our team also is dedicated to developing real-world quantum algorithms, understanding their implications, and designing comprehensive software architecture for programming such algorithms on a scalable, fault-tolerant, quantum computer.” (With thanks from the source: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/research-areas… )

It has Topological Quantum Computing as well that says:

“Topological Quantum Computing:

Quantum computers should be capable of performing tasks that would be very difficult, if not impossible, with digital computers, such as finding the prime factors of large numbers, searching large databases, and simulating quantum systems. However, enormous scientific and engineering challenges must be overcome for scalable quantum computers to be realized. Topological quantum computation is a proposal of a particular class of quantum systems.

(With thanks from the sources: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/quant… and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_quantum_… )

How all of it invites attention say from India says something like this:

“The laws of quantum physics permit us to process information using what is known as quantum computing. A quantum computer is different from a digital computer that we are so familiar with. While quantum computing sounds like a new technology, the fact is that it is a mathematical approach to finding efficient solutions to computational problems.

Quantum computers can be realized using both top-down approach (based on existing silicon CMOS technology) or bottom-up approach (self-assembly). If we use top-down approaches, we are bound to face the similar road blocks common to highly scaled down silicon technologies. Setting up of such nanoscale fabrication facilities is very expensive running into more than US $ 6 billion. In India, the most cost effective method is to encourage the research groups to focus on bottom-up approaches. This will buoy up a large number of researchers since they can establish the required facilities with moderate cost. Existing expensive nano-research facilities in some of the IITs and IISc should be encouraged to follow the top-down approach to realize practical qubits and their chip level integration.

Some of the important quantum computing research concerns for India in the next ten years, therefore, should be:

1) Develop basic technologies for realizing qubits.

2) Integrate qubits and develop quantum computer test beds by optimizing the architectural issues.

3) Develop quantum algorithms and implement them on quantum computer test beds to demonstrate a proto-type quantum computer that works better than a digital computer.

4) Parallel to this effort, we need to work on issues related to noise, error correction algorithms, data storage and data communication within the quantum computer and between the quantum computers.

In addition, we should also give top priority to the following:

1) Identify the strengths and weaknesses of major research groups working in Josephson junction circuits, single electron quantum dots, and ion traps and set appropriate milestones with sufficient funding. Also encourage groups working with approaches other than the above to realize quantum computers.

2) Encourage theoretical computer scientists and mathematicians to work in close collaboration with experimentalists.

3) Have regular workshops and conferences among the above groups.

4) Establish national level high value fellowships to encourage doctoral and post-doctoral researchers to work in this area.” (Please read more from the source with our thanks: https://mamidala.wordpress.com/2014/06/25/quantum-… )

As we have discussed the Hypothesis of Philselfology for Consciousness with the Languages, Linguistics, Grammars and the Sacred Systems, we notice the major points in the western and the modern civilizations:

“John Searle suggests that the obsession with the philosophy of language of the last century has been superseded by an emphasis on the philosophy of mind,<30> in which functionalism is currently the dominant theory. In recent years, a central focus for research in the philosophy of mind has been consciousness. And while there is a general consensus for the global neuronal workspace model of consciousness,<31> there are many opinions as to the specifics.” (With thanks from the source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy )

If we say the Quantum Schwa is the Science, Art, Math and Logic simultaneously , we can know what is the hidden art in logic of our modern world civilizations:

“The idea of rationality, with which critical rationalism claims to go beyond positivism to set up a philosophy of the “technological age,” is simply “methodical and regulative,” in other words, it remains a part of positivism, but at the same time accepts the primary nature of a “creative spark” which is considered “a-rational”; <74> Albert even views critical rationalism as the “model for a way of life.” <75> The elements borrowed from life philosophy, realism, and objective idealism limit and modify its positivist features but do not eliminate them <76> (critical rationalism continues to fight materialist dialectics with the argumentation of positivism). Critical rationalism tries to reestablish the philosophies of “life” and “being” within the frame of a modified and—compared to other bourgeois streams—open positivism; it does not overcome but reproduces the basic formulary of the crisis of late-bourgeois philosophy.” (With thanks from the source: http://www.autodidactproject.org/other/gedoco2a.ht… )

As our modern world and the civilizations now have the emergence of Homotopy Type Theory and the Foundations of Invariant Mathematics and the Quantum Computing and Programming, we need to have the Quantum Language, Grammar and Linguistic Systems of Phonemes, Phonics, Phonetics, and all that deals the Sacred Mathematical and Linguistic Systems of Consonants, Vowels, Digraphs, Phonic, Phonetic, Phonemes and the all that relates to it as the Second Subject to the Native or the First Language, and such that if we want to learn the Second Language, it can have the Quantum, the Practical Language Systems of the Phonics are separate from the Languages to boost the Global Changes and Developments of Classical Civilizations to the Quantum Civilizations, and there seems one of the greatest wonder that most of people in the world civilizations, countries and communities now seem to know a very very little about these systems. Thus initiating it as the Second Subject to Classical Language Systems seems one of the most urgent need before we jump blindly into the Quantum Ocean knowing almost nothing about the “Quantum of Languages”! 

Just a note from the previous blog post: When we look at the Classical Math, Computing and Programming, we notice the Role of BIT, the Vidya Systems as the Classical Systems, while we have the Quantum Qubit as the Kala Systems in the Quantum Math, Computing and Programming.

Classifications of Classical (Vidya, the BIT Systems in Math, Computing and Programming) and Quantum (Kala, the Qubit Systems in Math, Computing and Programming) Alphabets based on Hypothesis of Philselfology: If we want to know the difference between the Classical and the Quantum Systems, it’s very simple in the Indian Sacred Systems, and here the Classical Systems are called the Vidya, the Educational Systems that differ in every state, country and or continental level say the Classical Alphabets of the Languages. On the other hand, the Quantum Systems are called the Essence of Vidya, the Education and it’s the same thing in the world, and thus the Quantum or the Phonetic Alphabets, the IPA represents the Kala, the Quantum of the Human Sounds. There are 64 Vidya, the Classical Sacred Systems in the world, and 16 Kala, the Quantum Sacred Systems, and if we use our common sense the “A, E, O, AE” Systems that create the 16 Vowels seem to fully work as the Quantum Systems in the Phonetic Systems, and the 64 Derivative Vowels and Consonants seem to work as the Vidaya Systems. The Vidya needs the Consonants as the derivatives of vowels, but the Kala needs only the vowels as it appears from the Structural and the Dipole, the 4 Pada Systems of the Indian Sacred Systems, Merkaba, the Mantra and other Symmetry and Supersymmetry based Systems. The Asymmetric Systems then tend to the Consonants without which we may not have the Information Universe.

In the Information Universe, the Classical Alphabets seem to correspond to the Classical Universe while the Quantum Alphabets seem to correspond to the Quantum Universe, and thus together they create the Body of Information, the Blend of Vidya and Kala, yes the BIT and the Qubit! 

We will edit and add.

The Previous Part of the Series: How Quantum Schwa Explains Origin of Modern Hypothesis of Schwa Quantum Qubit Computing, IBM with Shva, Schwa, Shiva, Positivism, World Languages, Linguistics, Grammars, Quantum Systems, Art, Math and Logic: Gurmukhi and Be Happy Philselfologically 166

The Next Part of the Series:
How A’, A, and 2A in Linguistics Create Quantum Circles, Braids, Strings, Braided Groups, Knots, Topological Quantum Logic Gates, TGD, TQC, DNA Topological Quantum Computing and 4 Operators : Gurmukhi, Schwa and Be Happy Philselfologically 168

Thanks for your time!

Be Happy Philselfologically while listening to Good Quality Music Everyday!